Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-toile
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 16:39, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Largely unknown "group of research". This is apparently part of a strategy aiming to publicize one Yannick Bressan and his personal researchs. Article is also proposed for deletion on the french wikipedia (where the "Yannick Bressan" entry has been deleted). Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 09:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't look like it passed WP:ORG in the 5 years it supposedly existed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Yannick Bressan, if that survives its own AFD. If not, tough. Johnbod (talk) 13:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:PROMOTION compliment to the promotional article of Yannick Bressan, which itself is currently at AfD and seems likely itself to be deleted. No sources. Uncontroversial delete. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.